Raw Footage of Inside the Asbestos-Ridden School, Mainstream Media Censors the Reports of FBI Intimidating Sandy Hook Residents into Silence
When I heard that the Sandy Hook school was going to be demolished, I really felt I should get up there for one last look, as well as follow up on some information from the previous trip. I received a ride from a friend, and we traveled to the town on October 20, 2013. I got up close to the school once again, showing that there are no new “barricades” as the mainstream media reported. I was also able to film the inside of the school by zooming in on some windows.
I tried to interview a Sandy Hook resident named Roy Low who was on the scene to witness the cops apprehend a possible second suspect at the school shooting. I managed to catch him as he was finishing up repairs on his roof with what appeared to be his sons. In the video, you’ll hear an audio recording of our conversation in which he reveals the FBI is intimidating the locals. I have a personal message for the FBI: do not mess with the Low family, or any other innocent residents. If you do, you will not only answer to me, but to a legion of people armed with the truth. I swear, if I hear about anything suspicious, or if anything strange should happen to me, there will be hell to pay.
I tried to interview a Sandy Hook resident named Roy Low who was on the scene to witness the cops apprehend a possible second suspect at the school shooting. I managed to catch him as he was finishing up repairs on his roof with what appeared to be his sons. In the video, you’ll hear an audio recording of our conversation in which he reveals the FBI is intimidating the locals. I have a personal message for the FBI: do not mess with the Low family, or any other innocent residents. If you do, you will not only answer to me, but to a legion of people armed with the truth. I swear, if I hear about anything suspicious, or if anything strange should happen to me, there will be hell to pay.
I also tried to follow up on some information I received on my last visit to Sandy Hook on March 6, 2013. On that first trip, I interviewed the infamous Gene Rosen, and caught him in another slight discrepancy concerning his version of events that day. I also spoke with Jessica Saren. She is the daughter of (former) Sandy Hook resident Marilyn Gudsnuk.
I mentioned to Jessica that her mother did a TV interview on the day of the alleged shooting in which she described seeing a man driving around the firehouse "looking for his kids" as children were running away from the school screaming bloody murder. Jessica volunteered the bombshell information that her mother was actually talking about Gene Rosen. This, of course, would also contradict Rosen's testimony quite a bit. For more information, please see my first video visit to Sandy Hook.
I mentioned to Jessica that her mother did a TV interview on the day of the alleged shooting in which she described seeing a man driving around the firehouse "looking for his kids" as children were running away from the school screaming bloody murder. Jessica volunteered the bombshell information that her mother was actually talking about Gene Rosen. This, of course, would also contradict Rosen's testimony quite a bit. For more information, please see my first video visit to Sandy Hook.
When I went back to the Gudsnuk house on October 20, 2013, it was abandoned. In the video, you will see my initial shock at this discovery, but I have since learned that Marilyn Gudsnuk was the "caretaker" of a 91-year-old woman who lived at the house in Sandy Hook. Marilyn's daughter Jessica, the woman I spoke to, described this elderly woman (who I did not see) as her grandmother. The elderly woman apparently passed away in mid-2013, and the house was put up for sale after that. You can read more about this here, or check out the text below. Perhaps the most interesting development from this lead is that, when I posted this video/blog on my site BrendanHunt.com back in October 2013 (click here). Marilyn and one of her family members posted in the comments section. They did not challenge my report, but instead, seeked to clarify their connection with the events in question. I believe that my investigative work in this matter points to a serious inconsistency with the official narrative, and has grave implications for us all. |